|
Excellent - 4
|
Good - 3
|
Satisfactory - 2
|
Needs Improvement - 1
|
| Subject Knowledge |
Subject knowledge is evident throughout the project. All information is clear, appropriate, and correct.
|
Subject knowledge is evident in much of the project. Most information is clear, appropriate, and correct.
|
Some subject knowledge is evident. Some Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.
|
Subject knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.
|
| Citing Sources |
All sources are properly cited.
|
Most sources are properly cited.
|
Few sources are properly cited.
|
No sources are properly cited.
|
| Organization |
The sequence of information is logical and intuitive. Menus and paths to all information are clear and direct.
|
The sequence of information is logical. Menus and paths to most information are clear and direct.
|
The sequence of information is somewhat logical. Menus and paths are confusing and flawed.
|
The sequence of information is not logical. Menus and paths to information are not evident.
|
| Originality |
The project shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, and inventive.
|
The project shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness.
|
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is little evidence of new thought or inventiveness.
|
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products, and images. There is no evidence of new thought.
|
| Technical |
Project runs perfectly with no technical problems. For example, there are no error messages, all sound, video, or other files are found.
|
Project runs adequately with minor technical problems.
|
Project runs minimally. There are many technical problems when viewing the project.
|
Project does not run satisfactorily. There are too many technical problems to view the project.
|
